首页> 外文OA文献 >Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in traumatic corneal abrasions
【2h】

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in traumatic corneal abrasions

机译:外用非甾体类抗炎药,用于外伤性角膜擦伤的镇痛

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Traumatic corneal abrasions are relatively common and there is a lack of consensus about analgesia in their management. It is therefore important to document the clinical efficacy and safety profile of topical ophthalmic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the management of traumatic corneal abrasions.\ud\udOBJECTIVES: To identify and evaluate all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of topical NSAIDs with placebo or any alternative analgesic interventions in adults with traumatic corneal abrasions (including corneal abrasions arising from foreign body removal), to reduce pain, and its effects on healing time.\ud\udSEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2017, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 30 March 2017), Embase Ovid (1947 to 30 March 2017), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database) (1982 to 30 March 2017), OpenGrey (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe) (www.opengrey.eu/); searched 30 March 2017, ZETOC (1993 to 30 March 2017), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch); searched 30 March 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov); searched 30 March 2017 and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en); searched 30 March 2017. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.We checked the reference lists of identified trials to search for further potentially relevant studies.\ud\udSELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing topical NSAIDs to placebo or any alternative analgesic interventions in adults with traumatic corneal abrasions. DATA COLLECTION AND \ud\udANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed data extraction and assessed risks of bias in the included studies. We rated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. \ud\udMAIN RESULTS: We included nine studies that met the inclusion criteria, reporting data on 637 participants.The studies took place in the UK, USA, Israel, Italy, France and Portugal. These studies compared five types of topical NSAIDs (0.1% indomethacin, 0.03% flurbiprofen, 0.5% ketorolac, 1% indomethacin, 0.1% diclofenac) to control (consisting of standard care and in four studies used placebo eye drops). Overall, the studies were at an unclear or high risk of bias (particularly selection and reporting bias). None of the included studies reported the primary outcome measures of this review, namely participant-reported pain intensity reduction of 30% or more or 50% or more at 24 hours. Four trials, that included data on 481 participants receiving NSAIDs or control (placebo/standard care), reported on the use of 'rescue' analgesia at 24 hours as a proxy measure of pain control. Topical NSAIDs were associated with a reduction in the need for oral analgesia compared with control (risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.61; low-certainty evidence). Approximately 4 out of 10 people in the control group used rescue analgesia at 24 hours. No data were available on the use of analgesia at 48 or 72 hours.One trial (28 participants) reported on the proportion of abrasions healed after 24 and 48 hours. These outcomes were similar in both arms of the trial. (at 24 hours RR 1.00 (0.81 to 1.23); at 48 hours RR 1.00 (0.88 to 1.14); low-certainty evidence). In the control group nine out of 10 abrasions were healed within 24 hours and all were healed by 48 hours. Complications of corneal abrasions were reported in 6 studies (609 participants) and were infrequently reported (4 complications, 1 in NSAID groups (recurrent corneal erosion) and 3 in control groups (2 recurrent corneal erosions and 1 corneal abscess), very low-certainty evidence). Possible drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in two trials (163 participants), with the number of adverse events low (4 AEs, 3 in NSAID group, including discomfort/photophobia on instillation, conjunctival hyperaemia and urticaria, and 1 in the control group, corneal abscess) very low-certainty evidence.\ud\udAUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the included studies do not provide strong evidence to support the use of topical NSAIDs in traumatic corneal abrasions. This is important, since NSAIDs are associated with a higher cost compared to oral analgesics. None of the trials addressed our primary outcome measure of participant-reported pain intensity reduction of 30% or more or 50% or more at 24 hours.
机译:背景:创伤性角膜擦伤比较普遍,并且在治疗中还没有关于镇痛的共识。因此,重要的是记录局部眼用非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID)在治疗角膜擦伤中的临床疗效和安全性。\ ud \ ud目标:鉴定和评估所有随机对照试验(RCT),比较在患有创伤性角膜擦伤(包括因异物清除而引起的角膜擦伤)的成人中,使用局部NSAIDs与安慰剂或任何其他镇痛措施配合使用,以减轻疼痛及其对愈合时间的影响。\ ud \ ud搜索方法:我们搜索了Cochrane对照试验中央登记册(CENTRAL)(包含Cochrane眼睛和视觉试验登记册)(2017年第2期),MEDLINE Ovid(1946年至2017年3月30日),Embase Ovid(1947年至2017年3月30日),LILACS(拉丁美洲以及加勒比卫生科学文献数据库)(1982年至2017年3月30日),OpenGrey(欧洲灰色文献信息系统)(www.opengrey.eu/); 2017年3月30日在ZETOC(1993年至2017年3月30日),ISRCTN注册中心(www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch)中进行搜索; 2017年3月30日在ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrials.gov)上进行搜索;在2017年3月30日和世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)中进行了搜索(www.who.int/ictrp/search/en);搜索日期为2017年3月30日。我们没有在电子搜索试验中使用任何日期或语言限制。我们检查了已鉴定试验的参考清单,以寻找进一步可能相关的研究。\ ud \ ud选择标准:将局部NSAID与安慰剂或药物进行比较的RCT成人外伤性角膜擦伤的任何其他止痛措施。数据收集和分析:两名评价作者独立进行数据提取,并评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们使用GRADE评估了证据的确定性。主要结果:我们纳入了9项符合纳入标准的研究,报告了637名参与者的数据。这些研究分别在英国,美国,以色列,意大利,法国和葡萄牙进行。这些研究比较了五种局部使用的非甾体抗炎药(0.1%吲哚美辛,0.03%氟比洛芬,0.5%酮咯酸,1%吲哚美辛,0.1%双氯芬酸)与对照(由标准护理组成,在四项研究中使用安慰剂眼药水)。总体而言,研究处于偏倚(尤其是选择偏倚和报告偏倚)的风险尚不明确或较高的状态。纳入研究均未报告该评价的主要结局指标,即参与者报告的24小时疼痛强度降低30%以上或50%以上。包括481名接受NSAID或对照(安慰剂/标准护理)参与者的数据在内的四项试验报告了在24小时内使用“挽救”镇痛作为控制疼痛的指标。与对照组相比,局部NSAIDs减少了口服镇痛的需要(风险比(RR)0.46,95%置信区间(CI)0.34至0.61;低确定性证据)。对照组中,十分之四的人在24小时使用了急救镇痛。没有关于48或72小时使用镇痛药的数据。一项试验(28名参与者)报告了24和48个小时后he愈的比例。在试验的两个方面,这些结果相似。 (24小时RR 1.00(0.81至1.23); 48小时RR 1.00(0.88至1.14);低确定性证据)。在对照组中,每10例擦伤中有9例在24小时内得到治愈,所有这些在48小时内得到治愈。 6项研究(609名参与者)报告了角膜擦伤的并发症,很少报道(4例并发症,NSAID组1例(复发性角膜糜烂),对照组3例(2例复发性角膜糜烂和1例角膜脓肿),其准确性很低证据)。在两项试验(163名参与者)中报告了可能的药物相关不良事件(AE),不良事件的数量很低(4 AE,NSAID组为3,包括滴注时的不适/畏光,结膜充血和荨麻疹,以及1例\ ud \ ud作者的结论:所纳入研究的结果并未提供强有力的证据来支持局部使用NSAIDs在创伤性角膜擦伤中的应用。这很重要,因为与口服镇痛药相比,非甾体抗炎药的成本更高。没有一项试验涉及我们的主要结果指标,即参与者报告的24小时疼痛强度降低30%以上或50%以上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号